Buy a full case and the price per unit drops automaticallyRequest a sample
AccountCart0
All ContainersBottlesJarsCaps & ClosuresPumps & SprayersTubs & PailsJugsDroppersTinsTubesAccessories
Industries
Learn
Selling it

Green claims, and the Green Guides

Updated

On this page5

Almost every small cleaning brand is positioned as the greener alternative, and that vocabulary is regulated advertising.

The vocabulary this category runs on

Natural. Eco-friendly. Non-toxic. Biodegradable. Plant-based. Chemical-free. Safe.

Every one of those is an environmental or safety claim, and the FTC's Green Guides cover exactly this territory.

What the Green Guides say

The governing principle is that a claim must be substantiated and must not convey more than can be substantiated.

Unqualified general environmental benefit claims are treated most skeptically, because a phrase like "eco-friendly" implies benefits across the board that almost nothing can support.

The guides' answer is qualification: a specific, substantiated claim about a specific attribute, rather than a general one.

"Biodegradable" in particular carries an expectation about complete breakdown within a reasonably short period in the disposal environment, which is a testable claim rather than a descriptive one.

The claims to avoid

"Chemical-free", which is not true of anything and reads as unserious to anyone technical.

"Non-toxic" unqualified, which is a safety claim about all routes of exposure and is hard to support for a product that carries FHSA cautionary labeling.

"Safe", likewise, and especially "safe around children and pets", which is a strong claim about a product the label may also say to keep out of reach of children.

"Natural" alone, which has no accepted definition here.

And note the collision: a product with a DANGER signal word and a "non-toxic" front panel is making two statements a regulator can read side by side.

The claims worth making

Specific and factual. A named certification such as EPA Safer Choice, which is a real program with criteria behind it.

A named attribute: "plant-derived surfactants", "no added dye", "concentrated, so you ship less water".

The full ingredient list, published, which is the strongest thing a small maker can do and is increasingly required anyway.

And the concentrate argument, which is quantifiable, honest, and better than any adjective.

References

US Federal Trade Commission. Green Guides, 16 CFR Part 260, on environmental marketing claims including "non-toxic", "natural", "biodegradable" and unqualified general environmental benefit claims. ftc.gov
US Environmental Protection Agency. Safer Choice, the voluntary certification program for cleaning products meeting the agency's safer chemical criteria. epa.gov
Federal Hazardous Substances Act and 16 CFR Part 1500, which require cautionary labeling on household products containing hazardous substances: the signal word, the hazard, precautionary measures, first aid and the instruction to keep out of reach of children. ecfr.gov
Written from the federal regulation and agency guidance named on each page, not from a laboratory or a legal practice. Whether a particular product and a particular label make a cleaner or a pesticide is a determination about your product, and this is not that determination.