Buy a full case and the price per unit drops automaticallyRequest a sample
AccountCart0
All ContainersBottlesJarsCaps & ClosuresPumps & SprayersTubs & PailsJugsDroppersTinsTubesAccessories
Industries
Learn
All Containers›Shop by use case›Cleaning products›Bottles and closures›Child-resistant closures, and when they are requiredShop all cleaning →
Bottles and closures

Child-resistant closures, and when they are required

Updated

On this page6

The clearest case in this estate of a container specified by law rather than by preference, and the trigger is a number in your formula rather than anything about the bottle.

The formula decides the closure

The Poison Prevention Packaging Act lists substances that require special packaging above a stated concentration in the product as sold.

Cross one and a child-resistant closure is a legal requirement. Stay below and it is a choice.

Which means the closure cannot be chosen until the formula is settled, and it is a decision that can be reversed by a reformulation in either direction. The thresholds and the arithmetic are on the check page, because they are a calculation rather than a discussion.

It is a tested performance standard, not a feel

"Child-resistant" is defined: significantly difficult for children under five to open, or to obtain a harmful amount from, within a reasonable time, and not difficult for normal adults to use properly.

That second half is a requirement too, and it is why the closures are as they are rather than simply stiff.

16 CFR 1700.15 sets the effectiveness requirement and 1700.20 the protocol, which is run with panels of children and of adults. A closure is child-resistant because it passed that, not because it clicks.

The closure and the bottle are one system

The requirement is on the package, so the tested combination is a closure on a particular finish, not a closure alone.

Putting a certified closure on a different finish, or on a bottle with a different thread profile, is outside what was tested.

Which in practice means buying the bottle and the closure as a pair, from a supplier who can tell you they were tested together, and not mixing suppliers for the sake of a price.

What to get from the supplier

Documentation that the package meets the standard, naming the closure and the bottle finish.

A liner suitable for your chemistry, because the liner is what seals and it is the component nobody specifies.

And torque guidance, because a child-resistant closure applied at the wrong torque may not perform as tested.

Keep all of it with the product file. It is the evidence that the package was chosen rather than assumed.

When to re-check

Any reformulation, in either direction.

A supplier change on a raw material whose concentration might differ.

A move from ready-to-use to a concentrate, which raises every concentration in the bottle and is the common way a product acquires this requirement.

And a new size, if the closure finish changes with it.

References

Poison Prevention Packaging Act, 16 CFR 1700.14, Substances requiring special packaging. Thresholds relevant to household cleaners include sodium and/or potassium hydroxide at 2 percent or more in liquid (10 percent dry), methyl alcohol at 4 percent, sulfuric acid at 10 percent, turpentine at 10 percent, and nonemulsion liquid furniture polish with 10 percent or more petroleum distillates below 100 SUS. ecfr.gov
16 CFR 1700.15 and 1700.20, the effectiveness standards for child-resistant packaging and the protocol for testing it against children under five and normal adults. ecfr.gov
Federal Hazardous Substances Act and 16 CFR Part 1500, which require cautionary labeling on household products containing hazardous substances: the signal word, the hazard, precautionary measures, first aid and the instruction to keep out of reach of children. ecfr.gov
Written from the federal regulation and agency guidance named on each page, not from a laboratory or a legal practice. Whether a particular product and a particular label make a cleaner or a pesticide is a determination about your product, and this is not that determination.