Naming a plant-based product, and the draft guidance
Updated
On this page7
What the draft recommends
That the term used, whether milk, beverage or drink, be qualified by the plant source of the food. The name may be one word, two words or hyphenated. And that a product using the word milk whose nutrient composition differs from milk carry a voluntary statement describing how it differs nutritionally.
Voluntary means voluntary
The nutrient statement is a recommendation, not a requirement, and the document is draft guidance rather than a rule. Treating it as settled law would be wrong; ignoring it would also be unwise, because it represents the agency’s current thinking and buyers increasingly expect the information.
The example FDA gives is concrete
A label might say that the product contains lower amounts of vitamin D and calcium than milk. That is a specific, checkable comparison rather than a general disclaimer, which means it is a claim you need the numbers to support.
Why this is contested at all
Because milk has standards of identity attached to it and the dairy industry has long argued that the word should be reserved. The draft guidance is the agency’s attempt to resolve a long dispute, which is why it has attracted the comment it has and why a maker should expect the position to move.
What to do in the meantime
Qualify the word with the plant source, be accurate about nutrition, and be ready to change the label. Designing artwork that cannot accommodate a nutrient statement is the avoidable mistake here.
State law is a separate layer here
Several states have their own statutes about the use of dairy terms on non-dairy products, and they do not all agree with each other or with the federal draft. A product sold across several states can therefore face a naming requirement that FDA guidance does not mention, which is worth checking before a national label is printed.