Making more of it
Updated
Growth here is pulled between testing economics, which reward large batches, and uniformity and shelf life, which punish them.
Two ceilings
The operational ceiling is filling and sealing, which scale linearly with units.
The technical ceiling is that blend time and mixing energy do not scale with volume, and a larger batch segregates more on discharge and on filling. A doubled batch is a re-qualification.
Most categories have only the first.
What breaks first
Usually filling, because it is slow, dusty and the point where segregation shows up as drift through a run.
Then blending, once the batch exceeds what your blender handles at a proper fill level, since an over-filled blender folds badly and an under-filled one segregates.
Then storage, because raw materials and finished stock both need sealed, dry, temperature-stable space and both grow at once.
Fix in this order
An auger filler with check-weighing, which addresses speed, accuracy and dust exposure together.
A larger blender, sized so your normal batch sits at a proper fill level rather than at its limit.
Sealed storage, which is unglamorous and protects everything upstream and downstream.
People, last, because you cannot hand over a process that is not documented and the rule expects it to be documented anyway.
When more volume is wrong
When shelf life constrains it. A product with a declining active batched to a year's demand spends most of its life in the back half, where overage stops covering decline.
And when the range rather than the volume is the problem. Every additional formula carries its own testing and its own breakeven, so fewer products made more often is frequently both more profitable and easier to control.