Buy a full case and the price per unit drops automaticallyRequest a sample
AccountCart0
All ContainersBottlesJarsCaps & ClosuresPumps & SprayersTubs & PailsJugsDroppersTinsTubesAccessories
Industries
Learn
Beyond the tub

Stick packs and single serve

Updated

On this page5

Single-serve is the only format in this category that removes the scoop problem, which makes it worth more than its usual positioning as a travel convenience.

The format that fixes dosing

Measured scoop error runs from plus or minus 18 percent to nearly 40. A stick pack is filled by weight on your equipment, so the serving the customer takes is the serving you made.

It also removes the repeated-opening problem entirely: sealed until use, so no moisture uptake, no caking, and no degradation from the customer's kitchen.

What it is good for

Trial. The lowest-risk way for somebody to try an unfamiliar brand, and it posts in an envelope.

Potent products. Where a scoop error is a safety question rather than a value one, this is the honest format.

Travel and on-the-go, which is the conventional positioning and the least interesting reason.

Sampling at events, where handing out a sealed labeled single serve is defensible and scooping from an open tub is not.

What it costs

Packaging per gram is much higher, and there is more material per serving, which is a genuine waste argument customers raise.

Minimum runs are large, because the machinery is high-speed and set-up dominates short runs.

And it is contract work: stick-pack machinery is not a small-brand purchase.

Getting it made

A contract filler with stick-pack capability, working to your specification from your blend or theirs.

Settle who blends, because a filler working from your blend needs it delivered uniform and stable, and transport between blending and filling is a segregation opportunity.

And check the label: a stick pack carries the same Supplement Facts obligations as a tub in a much smaller area, which usually means an outer carton doing the regulatory work.

References

No published source. This page is written from practice rather than from published guidance. No extension service or agency publishes on this question for powders, so nothing here is cited, and it should be weighed as experience and not as a standard.
Written from published regulation and peer-reviewed work, not from a laboratory of our own. Your own certificates of analysis, your blend uniformity results and your own written specifications override anything general said here. Nothing on this site is a substitute for the records 21 CFR 111 requires you to keep.