In one building
Updated
On this page10
The wording
Processors "meet the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section and perform final product packaging within a single production facility operating under current good manufacturing practices".
Why it exists
Because a treated juice that is then moved, handled and bottled elsewhere has been exposed again. The point of a 5-log reduction is lost if the product is recontaminated after it.
Which constrains the co-packing model
Having juice treated by one business and bottled by another is the arrangement this wording speaks to. It is a question to resolve before building a business on it rather than after.
And it constrains the kitchen model too
A small producer pressing in one place and bottling in another, even across a yard, should read this rather than assume proximity is enough.
Current good manufacturing practices sit underneath
The facility operates under them, which is a standing obligation about the building, the equipment, the people and the records rather than about the juice.
For a small producer this is usually the deciding factor
Not the cost of a pasteuriser. Whether there is a single compliant facility where pressing, treatment and bottling can all happen is the practical question.
Which is why many start untreated
Fresh, local, short shelf life, with the warning on the bottle. It is a smaller business and a legitimate one, and it avoids this requirement by taking the other route rather than by ignoring it.
Document the layout and the flow
Where the juice goes from press to bottle, and what it touches. That description is half of a HACCP plan and it is the thing an inspector will want to walk.
It is also a records question
A single facility under current good manufacturing practices keeps records that connect the treatment to the batch that was bottled. Split the two and that chain has to be rebuilt across two businesses.