Lead free is not zero
On this page14
The definition has two figures
For solder and flux, not containing more than 0.2 percent lead. For pipes and fittings, not more than a weighted average of 0.25 percent lead over the wetted surfaces.
Which is the first finding
Lead free is a defined threshold rather than an absence. The words say free and the definition says a percentage.
And the two figures are different
0.2 for solder and flux and 0.25 for the wetted surfaces of pipes and fittings. Not the same number.
With the tighter limit on the solder
Which is the material that joins the system, held to a lower figure than the system itself.
That asymmetry is worth noticing
A joint is a small area and a high-exposure one, and the definition treats it more strictly rather than averaging it away.
The third finding is the averaging
Not more than a WEIGHTED AVERAGE of 0.25 percent, with respect to the wetted surfaces. Not a limit on each component.
So a small high-lead part can sit inside a compliant assembly
Because its contribution is weighted by its share of the wetted area, and a small share contributes little.
And a large component cannot
Which is the same arithmetic in the other direction, and it makes the geometry of an assembly part of the compliance question.
The wetted surface is the subject
Not the part and not its mass. A fitting's outside does not count toward anything.
Which is why this group's leaf list matters
Ten named articles, and a faucet aerator, a valve seat, an o ring, a supply washer and a compression ferrule are all wetted surfaces.
While a pipe clip and a push fit clip are not wetted at all
Which puts them outside the measure entirely, and they are on the same shelf in the same jar.
So the ten articles divide on a question about water contact
Which has nothing to do with their size, their material or how they are stored.
And nothing here determines any of it
Whether any article is lead free, and whether the requirement reaches it, is not established on these pages.