Four to one, the wrong way
On this page14
The split
117 PET, 78 polypropylene and 56 glass out of 251 containers. 195 plastic against 56 glass.
Which is a little over four to one
And is the ordinary shape of this catalog, because plastic is lighter, cheaper and unbreakable.
For most groups that is the right weighting
A jar of beads, a jar of buttons or a jar of dried fruit does not care what the wall is made of.
For a light steel part it is the wrong one
Because a plastic wall takes a static charge and a light steel part clings to it.
Which is the finding for this group
Two of the four leaves are light steel: a lock pin and a tumbler spring. Both cling.
And the other two are scratched rather than held
A key blank has a profile and a finish, and a padlock part has a working surface. Plastic walls score both.
So glass serves all four leaves better
No static, no scratching and no hazing, and there are 56 of them.
Against glass's own weakness
It breaks, which in a van or a tool bag is a real consideration and is why the catalog is weighted the other way.
The compounding property measures that trade
Our material ratings put glass at 5 of 5 for chemical resistance and 1 of 5 for impact, the only low rating in either set.
So the choice is static against breakage
Which is a genuine trade rather than a right answer, and this property names it rather than resolving it.
And the shelf lets you make it either way
56 glass containers is a fifth of the shelf, which is enough to build a kit from.
Polypropylene is the worse plastic of the two for static
78 containers. A polyolefin holds a charge more readily than PET, which is why the 117 PET sit in the middle of this question.
Which is the one axis of this shared shelf that this group needs
Sixteen groups use these 251 containers and for this group the material is the decision.