A spring clings to a plastic jar
On this page15
A tumbler spring is a few millimetres of steel wire
Light, springy, and almost weightless. Which makes it the article most affected by anything other than gravity.
And a plastic jar takes a static charge
Handled, rubbed against a bench or tipped out and back, a polypropylene or PET wall holds a charge that a light steel part will cling to.
So the spring does not come out
It sits on the inside wall above the heap, and tipping the jar does not move it.
Which is a real cost on a small part
Because the whole point of a sorted container is getting one out without hunting.
Glass does not do it
56 of the 251 containers. Glass does not accumulate a surface charge the way a polyolefin does, and a spring in a glass jar falls out.
So the split is four to one the wrong way
117 PET and 78 polypropylene against 56 glass. 195 plastic containers on a shelf where glass is the better answer for two of the four leaves.
A lock pin has the same problem
A small steel cylinder, light enough to cling. Two of the four leaves are light steel parts.
A key blank is heavy enough not to
Which is the other half of the group, and for a blank the problem is scratching rather than static.
A padlock part is in between
Depending on what it is: a shackle is heavy and a spring or a detent is not.
So the four leaves divide on weight
Light steel clings and heavy steel scratches, and the material answer differs for each.
And the shelf is weighted toward the wrong material for both
195 of 251 plastic, which scratches a blank and holds a spring.
Which is the honest statement of this shelf for this group
The 56 glass containers are the ones to look at and they are a fifth of what is offered.
And the closure does not help with static
179 of the 288 closures here are a plain polypropylene lid, which is the same material as the jar it closes. The charge is on the wall rather than at the mouth.
None of which is a legal question at all
Which is why five of this property's six sections are about the container.