Two percentages, both by volume
On this page10
The standards carry two de minimis exemptions and they differ
A window is out if it contains less than five percent by volume of composite wood products, combined, in relation to the total volume of the finished window.
And a door is out at three
Exterior doors and garage doors are out if they contain less than three percent by volume of composite wood products, combined, in relation to the total volume of the finished door.
Volume is the measure and that is the notable part
Weight indexes the suppression of a fiber name in the textile rules. Surface area indexes a trim exemption. An area-weighted average indexes the lead free definition. This is the first threshold in this library measured as a fraction of a finished article by volume.
Which fits what is being regulated
An emission comes from a mass of material, and a volume of composite wood is a reasonable proxy for how much material is present. Neither surface nor weight of the finished article would track it as well.
The word combined appears in both paragraphs
Several small composite parts are added together rather than assessed one at a time. Which closes the obvious route around a de minimis figure, which is to use many small pieces instead of one large one.
The two percentages are not explained
Five for a window and three for a door, with no reason given in the text. The pages note the difference rather than offering an account of it, because the rule does not supply one.
Doors also get a second route out that has no number in it
A door is out if it is made from composite wood products manufactured with no-added formaldehyde-based resins or ultra low-emitting formaldehyde resins. Which is a material condition rather than a quantity.
So one product class has two independent exemptions
Either a small enough proportion by volume, or the right resin system regardless of proportion. A door satisfying either is outside the standards.
And that pairing is a familiar shape
A quantitative route and a qualitative route to the same exemption. The textile fiber rules do the same thing when they suppress a name below five percent by weight unless the fiber has a definite functional significance.