Certified, or it may not be sold
On this page10
The prohibition is phrased as a permission
Beginning June 1, 2018, only certified composite wood products, whether in the form of panels or incorporated into component parts or finished goods, are permitted to be sold, supplied, offered for sale, or manufactured, unless specifically exempted by the part.
Certified means produced in accordance with every provision
Certified composite wood products are those produced or fabricated in accordance with all of the provisions of the part. Which makes certification a description of a process rather than a single test result.
A producer applies to a third-party certifier, not to the agency
The application goes to an EPA TSCA Title VI third-party certifier, and the certifier is itself accredited by an accreditation body. Three levels of oversight before a panel is certified.
A first application has eight listed components
Contact details, a copy of the quality control manual, the quality control manager’s name, an identification of the products and the resin system used, at least five supervised tests, at least five quality control tests, correlation data and a linear regression equation, and the results of an initial on-site inspection.
Five tests and five more, which is a notable amount of evidence
Compare the flammability standard for clothing textiles, which reaches a classification on five specimens and escalates to ten. This part asks for five chamber tests plus five quality control tests before a certification exists at all.
And it asks for a regression rather than a mean
Correlation data and a linear regression equation, or under the threshold approach the correlation data and the upper limit. The producer has to demonstrate a relationship between two test methods, not just pass one.
The certifier is on a clock
The certifier must act on a complete application within 90 calendar days of receipt by reviewing all of the components. Calendar days, which closes the usual argument about working days.
There is a provision for an inspection that cannot be done in person
Where a government entity has identified the existence of unsafe conditions, the certifier may conduct a virtual inspection via on-site video or teleconference technology, aligned with the standard operating procedure it would normally employ in person.
Which is a rare thing to find written into a federal inspection requirement
The paragraph does not loosen the standard, it relocates the method and ties the substitute explicitly back to the in-person procedure. Worth noting because most inspection requirements have no such route.