What this property does not cover
On this page15
Not what the Act requires of anyone
The definitions are quoted and the obligations are not. Who must do what, and to whom, is outside these pages.
Not the inspection or certification scheme
Which is the substance of the Act and is not described here at all.
Not the exemptions
There are circumstances in which the scheme does not apply, and none of them is set out.
Not which consensus standards are involved
The definitions refer to a specific consensus standard and do not enumerate them. Neither does this property.
Not whether any article is a fastener within the definition
Four conditions, two of them reachable by representation, and the answer is about a specific article.
Not whether any quantity is a lot
Which turns on a part number, a production process and a heat number, none of which is in our data.
Not thread specifications
Pitch, class of fit and thread form are engineering facts and a container catalog has nothing to say about them.
Not torque or load ratings
Nor any performance figure for any fastener. The grade mark is a claim and we do not evaluate it.
And not corrosion or coating
Which is the thing that usually decides a fastener choice and is outside this property entirely.
What is here is three definitions
A fastener, a lot and a grade identification marking, all quoted and all three with a container consequence.
Plus our specification coverage, measured
Ten fields across 251 containers, four of them complete, two almost absent, and none of them a lot number.
And one practical discipline
One lot per container, labelled at fill time, before the bag carrying the heat number is discarded.
Nor plating, which is the usual reason a fastener fails
A zinc or galvanised coating decides corrosion life and has nothing to do with the grade mark or the lot. It is the field a buyer actually wants and we publish nothing about it.
Which is free and is the only thing we can usefully recommend
Everything else belongs with the Act and with whoever reads it.