The scales were conflated
On this page15
A flashpoint was compared to a container rating
One is the temperature at which a liquid gives off enough vapor to ignite. The other is what the container tolerates.
So a 120 F container was thought to suit a 100 F flashpoint
Nothing follows. The container being within its range says nothing about whether the contents are above theirs.
Or to be unsafe for a 150 F flashpoint
Which also does not follow, and in the other direction.
The band boundaries were read loosely
At or below 20. Above 20 and below 100. At or above 100 to and including 150. Three different inclusivity patterns in three consecutive definitions.
So 100 F exactly was called flammable
It is combustible. The flammable band stops below 100 and the combustible band starts at or above it.
And a substance above 150 F was assumed to be in a band
The three bands stop at 150. Above it a substance is outside all three definitions.
A flashpoint was confused with an autoignition temperature
Two different measurements. A flashpoint needs an ignition source and an autoignition temperature does not.
The definitions were read as requirements
They are defined terms used in a labeling scheme, and what follows from a band is set out elsewhere and not here.
And a product was assumed to be a hazardous substance
Which is a determination about a specific product. Nothing on these pages makes one.
The test method was assumed
All three definitions cite the same method section and this property does not describe it.
The ambient temperature was left out entirely
Which is the one number that acts on both scales, and the one nobody writes down.
Three numbers and we supply one
The container rating. A flashpoint comes from the product documentation and the ambient from the use.
And our own two temperature figures were conflated as well
A container rating and the net quantity reference temperature in the bulk and dry goods property are both Fahrenheit figures on a packaging page, and one is a tolerance while the other is a measurement condition.
Read them separately, then together
Separately because they measure different things, and together because one environment acts on both.