What a container rating is not
On this page14
What it is
A statement about the temperature range the container tolerates. A material and geometry property.
Published on all 208 containers here
Which is complete coverage, and the field takes three values on this shelf: 120 F, 190 F and 300 F ceilings.
What it is not, first
A flashpoint. The container has no flashpoint; the contents do, and the two numbers describe different objects.
What it is not, second
A flammability statement. A container rated to 300 F does not make its contents less flammable and one rated to 120 F does not make them more so.
What it is not, third
A claim that a container may be used with a flame, a candle or a fuel. Only a manufacturer makes that claim and we publish none.
So the rating eliminates rather than permits
A 120 F ceiling settles that a container is not going near sustained heat. A 300 F ceiling does not settle that it is suitable.
Which is the same reading the meal prep property reaches
There, 109 of 176 containers topped out at 120 F and the pages refuse to turn a ceiling into a microwave claim.
And the same reading the compounding property reaches
About our five-point chemical resistance rating, which screens candidates and settles nothing.
A rating also says nothing about duration
A container rated to 300 F is not rated to be held at 300 F indefinitely, and a candle burns for hours.
Or about gradient
A candle heats a narrow band of wall above the melt pool, which is a local stress rather than a uniform temperature.
Or about thermal shock
Which is a rate problem. A hot container meeting cold water fails on rate rather than on temperature.
So one field, four things it does not cover
Flashpoint, suitability, duration and gradient. Which is a lot to leave out of a number that looks definitive.
Read it as a floor on the question, not an answer
And then ask the manufacturer, which is the only route to a real claim.