Fifty-one without a liner
On this page14
The liner distribution
67 heat induction seal, 44 F217, 32 pressure sensitive, 28 No Liner, 23 unrecorded, 23 Plastis standard, 15 foam, 5 polycone, out of 263 closures.
So 51 of 263 have no liner or no record
Which is nearly a fifth, on a shelf whose archetype is named for keeping humidity out.
And the two values are different statements
28 are recorded as No Liner, which is an assessment. 23 are blank, which is an absence of data and means ask.
Which is a distinction our Recyclable field cannot make
The refill and concentrate property measures that: one value, Yes, on all 803 rows, so a blank and a negative are indistinguishable. The liner field is better built.
Heat induction seal is the long-storage answer
67 closures. A bonded foil intact until broken, which suits a cache opened once in years.
F217 is the checked-kit answer
44 closures. Foamed polyethylene that reseals, for a container opened on a schedule and closed again.
Pressure sensitive is the weakest of the three
32 closures. It adheres on first closing and reads as a tamper indication more than a barrier.
5 polycone closures
Which seal a narrow neck, and this shelf has 6 containers at 48-400 and 5 at 38MM. A small matched set.
9 sealing discs
The only article here that makes a container read as unopened, out of 263 closures.
And 1 tamper evident lid
Which for a preparedness cache is the function that matters most and the count that is smallest.
179 of the 263 are plain lids
Continuous thread polypropylene, which seal and reseal and nothing else. The depth is in one article, as it is on most shelves here.
So the specification is two requests
A liner by name, and a sealing disc or tamper lid if the cache has to show whether it has been opened.
Neither is a default
Which is why 51 of 263 closures would quietly fail the one thing this archetype is named for.