The small bottle problem
On this page11
The smallest band is still a requirement
A panel of 0 to 2 square inches needs a signal word at 3/64 inch and a statement of hazard at 3/64 inch. Small, and not optional.
And the rest of the label still has to be there
Precautionary measures, first aid where required, the name and place of business, net contents. The small band reduces the height, not the content.
Which is why a 30 mL decant is a hard label
25 containers at 30 mL or under on this shelf. Each has a panel that has to carry a full set of required text at a legible height.
The arithmetic is unforgiving
Count the characters, set them at 3/64 inch cap height, and measure the block. On a two square inch panel it frequently does not fit with anything else on the label.
A tag or a hang label is one answer
Attached to the container rather than printed on it, carrying what the panel cannot. It has to stay attached, which is the obvious weakness.
A carton is the better one
A larger principal display panel, a band further up the table, and room for branding as well as compliance. The cost is an outer that gets thrown away.
Or do not sell it in that size
Which is the answer nobody likes and is often correct. If the smallest lawful label does not fit the smallest attractive bottle, the bottle is the thing to change.
Personal decanting is a different situation
A rider moving lube into a small bottle for their own saddlebag is not selling anything. The labelling duty in that case is the workplace one covered in the shop consumables property, or none at all.
But label it anyway
An unmarked bottle of something in a bag that gets opened at the roadside is a bad object. The reasons that are not legal are still reasons.
Decide the smallest size you can lawfully sell
Once, for the product, from the table. It becomes a fixed constraint on the range rather than a surprise at artwork stage.