Why there is no example mark here
On this page11
The regulation does provide examples
At paragraph (e)(2), for a fiberboard box, a steel drum for liquids and a steel drum for solids, each referring back to the numbered elements.
But they are images
The specimen marks are printed as graphics rather than as text, so there is no quotable string and nothing this property can reproduce exactly.
So it reproduces nothing
The elements and their order are quoted because they are text. A worked specimen is not, because inventing one would be publishing a mark that no regulation printed.
Which matters more here than elsewhere
A made-up example mark on a packaging catalog page is exactly the kind of thing somebody copies. A wrong one copied is worse than no example at all.
The same discipline appears twice more in this library
The model parts property declines to quote the small parts cylinder dimensions, which the rule gives in a figure. The fly tying property declines to list protected species.
What to do instead
Look at a marked container, or at the regulation's own figures. The elements on the previous page tell you what each position means and that is enough to read a real one.
And ask the manufacturer for the documentation
A UN specification packaging comes with a test report and a certification. The mark is the summary; the paperwork is the substance.
Which is the thing we cannot supply
We do not record the mark and we hold no test documentation. For specification packaging, buy from somebody who does both.
This is not hedging
It is the difference between a catalog that is useful and one that is dangerous. A buyer who believes an unmarked container is marked has been misled by the page.
Read the mark on what you buy
Whoever you buy from. The skill transfers and it is the only part of this that a container catalog can give you for free.