The data gap, stated first
On this page11
What this group is
Four leaves: UN rated liquid, UN rated solid, overpack and absorbent. Two of them are named for a certification.
And a certification is a mark
UN specification packaging is identified by a code stamped on the container, applied by the manufacturer of a tested design type. The mark is how you know.
Our catalog does not record it
We hold material, capacity, neck finish, dimensions and case pack. There is no field for a UN mark, so nothing on our pages can tell you whether a container carries one.
Which means we cannot serve two of the four leaves
Not because the shelf is thin, though it is the smallest in the library at 76 containers, but because the defining attribute is absent from the data.
Stated at the top rather than discovered at the bottom
A buyer shipping a regulated material needs certainty, and a catalog that lets them infer certainty from a product page it cannot support would be doing harm.
So why write the property at all
Because the mark is readable, and knowing how to read it is useful whoever you buy from. Nine elements in a fixed order, each a statement about a test.
And because two leaves we can serve
Absorbent and overpack are ordinary containers used in a regulated context. The shelf has 30 tubs and pails and 11 jugs, which is a genuine offering for one of them.
The honest division
Learn the mark here, buy the marked packaging from a supplier who certifies it, and come back for the things around it that are not themselves specification packaging.
This is a data gap, not a sourcing one
Which is worth distinguishing. Some of what we stock may well carry a mark; we simply do not publish it and so cannot say.
Fixing it would be a catalog change
A field, populated from manufacturer documentation, per product. Until that exists this property is the honest statement of the position.