Intended for use by children
On this page14
The statements attach to a category
Toys and other articles intended for use by children. Which is a statement about intention, not about the object.
So a marble collection is the test case
A bag of marbles for a child and a case of antique marbles for a collector are physically the same objects.
And one may require a statement while the other does not
Which is the finding for this group, and it is not a container question at all.
Nothing here determines it
Whether any product is a toy or an article intended for use by children is a determination, and this property does not make one.
Intention is read from the product, not from the maker's hope
How a thing is marketed, packaged, priced and sold all speak to intended use, which is why it is a determination rather than a declaration.
And a collectible is marketed to adults
Which is the usual position for all nine leaves here: bottle caps, dice, tokens, keychains, marbles, matchbooks, figures, badges and buttons.
But miniature figure is the leaf that crosses
A painted display figure and a toy figure are the same casting. The model parts property covers the adjacent small parts test.
And a dice set crosses too
Dice for a tabletop game sold to adults, and dice in a children's game, are the same dice.
Which means the group is two regimes wearing one name
Nine leaves that look like a single category and divide on a question about the buyer.
The packaging consequence is real
A required statement plus a symbol needs area, and the small end of this shelf is 16 containers under 30 mL with the smallest 0.617 inches across.
So the determination comes before the container
Because a statement that has to fit changes which container is possible.
And a container cannot help with the hazard itself
No jar prevents a choking hazard. The statement is a warning and the container is a container.
Which is worth saying on a packaging page
Because the instinct is to look for a safer container, and there is not one.