The neck was assumed to be matched
On this page12
The totals were read as coverage
215 closures against 74 containers looks like three options each. The distribution is nothing like that.
An 18DIN bottle was chosen
12 of them here and no 18DIN closure in the group. The most on-category neck on the shelf is the one with nothing to fit it.
Or a 43-485 bottle
One container, no closure. A single orphan is easy to miss in a list of 74.
A dropper and a child-resistant cap were both expected
41 droppers and 19 child-resistant closures, in separate families with no overlap. Both functions exist and the combined article does not.
Pipette length was not checked against bottle height
A dropper is specified by neck and a pipette has a length. Height is published on these containers, so the check is available and it is easy to skip.
Full case only was discovered at the end
71 of 74 containers here are full case only, which is the most extreme in the library. The right bottle at the wrong case size is still a problem.
Quote only was read as unavailable
20 of 74. The price is not published, which means a conversation rather than a dead end.
Clear glass was chosen for a full spectrum oil
20 clear containers here against 42 that offer real protection. This is the one cannabis shelf where the protective choice is the easy one, and clear is still available.
A liner was assumed because the field was blank
72 of 74 containers have no liner value and 2 read No Liner. A blank is an absence of data, so the answer is to ask.
Height was not read for the dropper
Which is a second version of the same skipped check. The 20-400 pairing is well stocked and a pipette still has to reach the bottom of a 120 mL bottle and not bottom out in a 10 mL one.
Check neck first, then case size
Those are the two that end a build, and both are published on the product page.