The container cannot help
On this page11
What is examined
Formulas, on a form. If they are found to be medicines, medicinal preparations, food products, flavors, flavoring extracts or perfume which are unfit for beverage purposes, they are approved for drawback.
Which is a sentence about the contents
Not about the bottle, the closure, the label or the way the product is presented. The package is not part of the test.
So the intuition fails
A 30 mL amber bottle with a glass pipette looks nothing like a drink, and the standard does not care how it looks.
Which is the inversion this property exists for
Every other spine in this library gives the container legal work to do. Here it has none, and knowing that stops a buyer solving the wrong problem.
Three cannabis properties did give it work
In edibles the container size decides what the label may declare. In concentrates the container is the unit a limit is measured in. In adjacent botanicals the label is one of the elements of the definition.
Here it is none of those
Four related categories, four completely different relationships between a package and a rule. Which is the argument for reading the rule before shopping.
And the regulation names a tincture that failed
Tincture of ginger, in a pharmacopoeia, has been found to be fit for beverage use and is disapproved for drawback. A named tincture, found to be a drink.
Which is worth sitting with
If a pharmacopoeia tincture can be fit for beverage use, then nothing about being called a tincture establishes the opposite.
What the container is for, then
Dose control, light protection, closure fit and a child-resistant option. All real problems, and this property has hard numbers on each.
Two of those numbers are bad
Twelve containers here have no closure that fits them, and 71 of 74 are full case only. Both are in the containers section.