Grams, not millilitres
On this page11
What we publish
A capacity in millilitres, on file for all 97 containers in this group. It is the field the whole catalog is organized around.
What the table asks for
Mass, for four of the seven categories that matter here: hard candies 2 g, all other candies 30 g, cookies 30 g, brownies 40 g.
And the two are not convertible
A 237 mL jar holds a different mass of gummies than of chocolate than of cookie. Bulk density is a property of the product and not of the jar.
So our data cannot answer four of the six leaves
Gummies, chocolate and baked goods are referenced by mass, and we have no mass field for the contents. A buyer cannot establish from our pages which band a jar puts them in.
The liquid leaves we can answer
Syrup, honey and beverage have millilitre or household-measure reference amounts, and our capacity field meets them directly. 22 containers under 60 mL, 2 between 60 and 90, 73 above.
Which is the same shape as the hazmat gap
There, the defining attribute of two leaves was a mark we do not record. Here, the defining attribute of four leaves is a mass we do not record. Both are data gaps rather than shelf gaps.
How to close it yourself
Fill one jar, weigh the contents, and you have the number for your product. It takes one measurement and it is specific to your recipe, which a catalog figure could never be.
Do that before committing to a size
Because the answer may move you one size up or down, and the size is the thing with the lead time.
And weigh the contents, not the package
The reference amount is about the food. A heavy double wall jar does not move you into a different band, and 26 of our 97 containers are double wall.
Stated rather than finessed
We could publish an estimated fill weight and it would be wrong for most products. An omitted field degrades; an invented one gets acted on.