Buy a full case and the price per unit drops automaticallyRequest a sample
AccountCart0
All ContainersBottlesJarsCaps & ClosuresPumps & SprayersTubs & PailsJugsDroppersTinsTubesAccessories
Industries
Learn
Preservation

The package is part of the preservation system

Updated

On this page6

In most crafts the container is chosen after the product is finished. In skincare the container is one of the variables the product's safety depends on, and choosing it late is how brands end up retesting.

The container is a formulation decision

Challenge data does not only tell you whether a formula is preserved. It tells you under what conditions it is preserved, and those conditions are frequently packaging conditions: airless delivery, a restricted period after opening, or tighter control on the filling line.

A formula that is marginal in a jar can be comfortable in an airless pump, because the package removes the two things that defeat preservation: repeated finger contact and continuous air ingress.

Jar, tube, pump, airless

An open jar is the hardest case. Fingers go in, air sits on the surface, and the product is re-inoculated on every use. It is also what customers associate with a rich cream, which is the tension.

A tube removes fingers and most of the air exchange. A pump removes fingers entirely but draws air back in as it empties. An airless system does neither: the product is displaced by a follower plate and never meets the atmosphere.

The order of that list is also, roughly, the order of unit cost.

What the challenge result tells you to buy

A comfortable pass in the intended package means you have a choice. A marginal one means the package is now part of the answer, and a jar may simply not be available to you.

For oxygen-sensitive actives the same logic arrives from the other direction. L-ascorbic acid degrades in oxygen and light, so an airless dispenser in opaque or dark glass is not a premium touch, it is what keeps the product a product.

Where this bites

When a brand designs the packaging first, orders it, and then discovers the formula needs something else. Packaging minimums are large and lead times are long, and the jar you already bought is not an argument the microbiology will accept.

Settle the package before the challenge test, and test in it.

What the reader puts their fingers in, and what they do not

1 oz Amber Glass Straight-Sided Round Jar
1 fl oz · 43-400 · Glass · to 300F
Glass straight sided jar. An open mouth, which means fingers, which means the preservative carries the whole load.
$0.29
each
See it
.5 oz Clear Glass Boston Round Bottle
0.5 fl oz · 18-400 · Glass · to 300F
Glass boston round. A narrow neck the user never reaches into. Most of the contamination route closes with it.
$0.26
each
See it
2.5 oz Clear PET Plastic Cosmo Round Bottle
2.5 fl oz · 20-410 · PET · to 120F
PET Imperial Bullet Cosmo. Dispensed rather than scooped, so what comes out does not go back in.
$0.16
each
See it
60 cc Dark Amber PET Packer Bottle
2 fl oz · 33-400 · PET · to 120F
PET Packer Bottle. A wide mouth still admits a hand or a spatula. Better than a jar, not a closed system.
Quote
See it

References

United States Pharmacopeia <51>, Antimicrobial Effectiveness Testing. The US standard for preservative challenge testing: five organisms, 28 days, counts at days 0, 2, 7, 14 and 28.
Cosmetic stability and packaging-compatibility practice: accelerated storage at 40 and 45 °C for 4 and 8 weeks, freeze-thaw cycling between −10 and +25 °C, centrifuge screening at 3,000–5,000 rpm, real-time at 25 °C/60% RH per ICH.
Written from published standards and peer-reviewed work, not from a laboratory of our own. Your own challenge and stability results, your supplier's specifications and a qualified safety assessment override anything general said here. Nothing on this site is a safety substantiation.