The wrong side of a threshold
Updated
On this page9
The three numbers
Methanol at 4 percent, ethylene glycol at 10 percent, hydrocarbons at 10 percent under 100 SUS. Each is a percentage by weight and each one, crossed, brings tested child-resistant packaging with it.
Seasonal blends move
A washer fluid rated to a colder temperature carries more methanol. If one blend in a range sits above 4 percent and another below, they are two different packaging problems in identical bottles, which is a labeling and stock-control trap.
A cheaper carrier changes the hydrocarbon count
Substituting a solvent for cost is a purchasing decision that can move a regulatory line, and the purchasing decision rarely reaches whoever owns the label. That is an organizational failure more than a technical one.
Nothing in the supply chain reports it
Bottles, closures and labels all arrive the same whatever the formula says. The only place a crossing is detectable is your own formula sheet, recomputed.
And a premix is not exempt because it is dilute
A 50/50 coolant is still far above 10 percent glycol. Dilution helps only where it actually lands below a threshold, and believing it helps in general is how this goes wrong.
Write the computed figure down, not the conclusion
The percentage, the date and the formula version. A conclusion with no working cannot be rechecked after a reformulation, so in practice it gets taken on trust until something forces the question.
Recompute on every change
New supplier, new carrier, new dilution, new temperature rating. It is arithmetic on a sheet you already have, and it takes minutes against a production run.
Who owns the recomputation
In a small operation it is whoever changed the formula; in a larger one it is nobody, because purchasing, blending and labeling sit apart. Naming the owner is a cheaper control than any test, and it is the one that actually catches a carrier substitution.