A word our own archetype uses
On this page11
What the archetype says
ind-lab, 10 to 1,000 mL, narrow mouth, glass and HDPE, with the stated reason "reagent or sample. Autoclavability and chemical resistance."
Which is the right requirement for a laboratory
A vessel that holds a sample and then gets sterilized is a real category and autoclavability is the property that defines it. The archetype is not wrong about the need.
And our data does not record it
No field in this catalog says whether a container tolerates an autoclave cycle. We hold material, capacity, neck finish and dimensions, and not this.
So we will not say a container is autoclavable
Not for any product on this shelf. Inferring it from the material name would be exactly the kind of invented value this catalog exists to avoid.
What we can say about the materials
Glass is generally autoclavable. Polypropylene is the polyolefin normally specified where an autoclave cycle is required. HDPE is not the material chosen for that duty.
Which is awkward, because the archetype names HDPE
Glass and HDPE are its two materials, and only one of them is a candidate for the stated requirement. That is a pipeline inconsistency rather than a catalog shortage.
And the shelf has 13 PP containers
Out of 414. If autoclavability is genuinely the requirement, 13 is the honest size of the relevant shelf, and the 154 HDPE containers are not it.
The 130 glass containers are the better answer
78 of them Boston rounds and 21 straight sided jars. Inert, inspectable, and the traditional vessel for exactly this duty.
But a closure is not glass
A glass bottle with a phenolic or polypropylene cap is a system, and the cap and the liner decide whether the assembly survives a cycle. 14 phenolic closures here, and the liner is unrecorded.
So ask the manufacturer, with the whole assembly named
Bottle, closure and liner, and the cycle you intend to run. That is a question with an answer, and it is not one this catalog can give.