What the section reaches
On this page12
An over-the-counter human drug product
Which is the first condition. A hygiene kit is not a drug product, and a water purification product may be a pesticide or a device rather than a drug.
Packaged for retail sale
The second. A kit assembled for a household, or for a cache, is not packaged for retail sale.
And accessible to the public while held for sale
The third, which is the reason the rule exists. The hazard addressed is a product sitting on a shelf a stranger can reach.
So most of this group is outside it
Which is worth stating first, because the rest of this property quotes a standard that may not apply to what a reader is doing.
Why quote it anyway
Because it is the only federal statement of what a tamper-evident package has to be, and the reasoning transfers to anyone who wants a package to show interference.
A long-term medication cache is the interesting case
One of this group's four leaves. A household repackaging medication for storage is not selling it, and still wants to know later whether a container has been opened.
Which is the same objective by a different route
Not compliance, but the practical question of whether the seal in front of you is the original one.
And the shelf answers that part
53 heat induction seals and 18 pressure sensitive liners out of 128 closures. Both show interference clearly.
What it does not answer is distinctiveness
Which matters for a retail product and matters much less for a container in your own store cupboard.
And the 18 child-resistant closures are a separate question again
A preparedness cache in a household with children raises child resistance, which this shelf does offer, and which is a different standard covered in the pet and veterinary property.
So read the rest for the mechanism
The definition, the two ways to be distinctive, and the placement rule for the statement. All three are useful whether or not the section binds you.