The four we do not make
On this page11
Urine collection
A wide mouth cup with a leakproof screw lid, often with a transfer device and a volume marked on the side. A specific moulded product, and there is not one on this shelf.
Specimen collection generally
Stool, sputum, tissue. Each has a conventional format with a scoop, a spoon or a preservative already in it, and all of them are made as specimen products rather than adapted from packaging.
Swab transport
A tube with a cap the swab shaft breaks against, usually holding a transport medium. The geometry is matched to the swab, and nothing here is.
Sample vial
Small, often with a septum or a specific cap for an autosampler. An analytical consumable matched to an instrument rather than a container choice.
Two tubes on this shelf
Which is the honest count against four leaves whose conventional format is a tube.
Why a packaging bottle is not a substitute
Volume graduations, sterility, a preservative dosed into the container, and a cap geometry the laboratory's instrument expects. Those are product features, not packaging features.
And the laboratory usually supplies them
Which is the commercial reality. A laboratory that will reject a sample in the wrong tube generally sends the right tube out, so this demand rarely reaches a packaging catalog at all.
Where we are genuinely useful instead
Bulk reagents, buffers, stains, washes and media, in bottles, for a laboratory making up its own. That is 246 bottles doing real work.
And for non-clinical sampling
Environmental and research samples that are not patient specimens. The field sampling property covers the water side of that in detail, including which materials each analyte permits.
Saying it plainly is the service
A clinic looking for urine cups should be told we do not have them, not sold a jar that looks similar. A rejected specimen costs a patient another visit.