Dry shampoo
On this page11
The two products
A powder, usually a starch or clay with an absorbent, shaken or brushed onto the roots. And an aerosol, the same idea suspended in a propellant and sprayed.
The powder we can serve
A shaker or sifter closure on a small jar or bottle. 13 spice caps on this shelf are the closest thing to a sifter here, which is a small set for the job.
The aerosol we cannot
Nothing on this shelf is a pressurized container. An aerosol dry shampoo needs a can, a valve and an actuator, and none of those is in this catalog.
So say it rather than show a jar
A buyer looking for aerosol dry shampoo packaging should be told we do not have it, not shown the nearest jar. That is the difference between a catalog and a search box.
The powder has its own problems
It dusts, it cakes with humidity, and it is dosed badly by everybody. The closure is doing more work than the container.
A sifter beats a shaker for a fine powder
A shaker with large holes dumps. A sifter with a fine screen gives a controlled release, which is the difference between the roots and the whole bathroom.
And a brush applicator is better again
Which is a specialty closure rather than a stock one. 8 specialty closures here, and for a powder sold on application quality that is the conversation to have.
Moisture is the shelf life question
Starch and clay both take up water and cake. A lined closure and a moisture barrier matter more for this product than for anything else in the group.
Inhalation is the safety question
A fine powder sprayed near a face is an inhalation exposure, which is why particle size and application method are formulation decisions with a packaging consequence.
And no monograph is involved
A dry shampoo that absorbs oil makes no treatment claim. It is a cosmetic and it carries cosmetic labeling, which keeps the label area problem off this leaf entirely.