Somebody decanted the powder
On this page12
It happened because the bench was tidy
A rack of matching clear jars, and powder in a cardboard-and-plastic can that does not match. The instinct to make it match is the failure.
Clear, sealed, strong and uniform
Every quality that makes a jar good for brass is a quality you do not want for propellant. The industry reason given is confinement.
And the label went with the can
Which is the second failure and often the worse one. Powders are not interchangeable, loads are developed for a specific one, and an unidentified powder is unusable.
Two powders ended up in one container
Looking identical, burning completely differently. There is no way back from that and the only safe outcome is disposal.
Primers went into a jar
Loose, touching, randomly oriented, moved every time the container was handled. They are supplied in trays for a reason.
The exemption was read as reassurance
Smokeless propellant for small arms is ammunition, and ammunition and its components are exempt from the federal explosives regulations. That describes a licensing scheme and not a material.
A quantity was assumed from the black powder figure
The 50 pound ceiling applies to commercially manufactured black powder in that exemption. It is not a smokeless figure and it is not a fire code limit.
Nobody read the local fire code
Which is where the storage quantities that actually bind come from, through NFPA 495 and state and local adoption, and they vary.
We were asked for a recommendation and should say no
A catalog that sells a jar for this is doing harm for one line item. The answer is the factory container and the local fire code.
The tidy bench is the risk factor
Which is worth naming because it is counterintuitive. The person who decants powder is usually the careful one, reorganising a bench into matching containers.
Everything else on the bench, yes
Eleven leaves, 210 jars, and a genuinely good sorting shelf. Refusing two is what makes the other eleven trustworthy.