Water treatment
On this page11
What the leaf covers
A chemical treatment carried in a small container: a halogen solution, a two-part chlorine dioxide, or tablets decanted from a bulk pack into something smaller.
Which is a pesticide, not a device
A substance intended to destroy a pest is a pesticide and has to be registered. The filter is the device; the chemical is the pesticide.
So the label carries a registration number
And an establishment number. If you are repackaging a treatment chemical into your own container, the labeling obligations are yours, and FIFRA misbranding is the relevant risk.
The janitorial property covers repackaging
The refillable container provisions and the conditions under which a pesticide may be repackaged are set out there and not repeated here.
What the container has to do
Resist a halogen, which attacks many things, and stay sealed under pressure change. Iodine stains and chlorine dioxide is an oxidizer, and both are hard on liners.
Which points at glass or a resistant liner
50 glass containers on this shelf and 9 phenolic closures. For a halogen solution those two are the serious combination, with glass in a pack as the obvious objection.
Amber for the ones that care about light
52 amber containers. Several treatment chemicals degrade in light and a clear bottle on the outside of a pack is a bad place for them.
Child resistant packaging is on the FIFRA list
Section 25(c)(3), and it survives the device exemption. 18 child resistant closures here, which is the relevant set for a treatment chemical kept at home between trips.
Two-part systems need two containers
And a way to not confuse them. Two identical bottles with handwritten labels is how a two-part treatment gets mixed wrong at a stream at dusk.
Which is why we say nothing about efficacy
The numbers people cite for filters and purifiers come from a guide standard rather than a rule. A catalog printing them would be lending authority it does not have to a claim somebody drinks on.