Deemed a food
On this page13
Paragraph (3) has a parenthesis in it
It requires regulations that the label on each package of a consumer commodity bear a common or usual name and, for a multi-ingredient commodity, the common or usual name of each ingredient in order of decreasing predominance.
With an exclusion
Other than one which is a food within the meaning of section 321(f) of title 21. So a food is outside paragraph (3).
And a dietary supplement is deemed to be a food
The concluding text of 21 U.S.C. 321(ff), which the adjacent botanicals property quotes, deems a dietary supplement to be a food within the meaning of that chapter, with two stated exceptions.
So paragraph (3) does not reach a supplement
The naming and ingredient requirements come from the food rules instead, which is a different body of regulation with different content.
Which is a routing provision rather than a requirement
It decides which scheme applies rather than what the label says, and getting it wrong means reading the wrong rules carefully.
Paragraph (3) also protects a trade secret
Nothing in it shall be deemed to require that any trade secret be divulged, which is a notable carve-out in an ingredient listing requirement.
And it does not reach the group this property is about
Which is worth saying so that nobody relies on a trade secret protection that sits in a paragraph a supplement is excluded from.
Paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) carry no such exclusion
So the size characterization, the price representation and the slack fill paragraphs reach consumer commodities generally.
Which is why the spine of this property is (1) and (4)
Those are the two that reach a supplement, and they are the two that are about the package.
The exclusion points at a different definition of food
Section 321(f) of title 21, which is the general food definition, rather than 321(ff) which defines a dietary supplement. The deeming clause in (ff) is what connects them.
So the route runs through two definitions
A supplement is deemed a food under (ff), a food is excluded from paragraph (3) by reference to (f), and the naming requirements come from the food rules instead.
Read the parentheses
Which is the transferable lesson. A single parenthesis moved an entire paragraph out of scope for this whole group.