The products

The seventy-two

On this page11

The overlap is nearly total 17 containers, median 1,420 mL Which is the difference between the two groups 4 wide mouth polyethylene containers And 4 foamer bottles 10 PET and 7 HDPE 55 of the 72 are closures So every spice cap on this shelf is specialty-only Which makes the 72 a coherent set And the 3 round tub lids matter more than they look References

17 containers and 55 closures, and they are the large end.

The overlap is nearly total

389 of these 461 rows also answer the gummies and chews group. 72 are specific to this one, and they are not a random 72.

17 containers, median 1,420 mL

Against a median of 355 across the whole shelf. The specialty-only containers run 163 to 3,000 mL, which is the bulk end.

Which is the difference between the two groups

A gummy jar is a retail count container and a recovery powder is a bulk one. The 72 rows are what bulk adds.

4 wide mouth polyethylene containers

Plus 3 plastic square grip containers and an HDPE round tub with handle. All of them formats for a scooped product in quantity.

And 4 foamer bottles

Which is the surprise. A foamer dispenses a liquid as foam and no leaf in this group is a liquid, so those four are on the shelf because the capacity matched.

10 PET and 7 HDPE

With no glass, which matches the rest of the shelf. The square grip containers are the storage-efficient option on a pallet and in a cupboard.

55 of the 72 are closures

29 continuous thread polypropylene lids, 13 spice caps, 6 metal CT caps, 3 round tub lids, 2 flip top caps, 1 spice sifter disc, 1 dome lid.

So every spice cap on this shelf is specialty-only

All 13 of them, plus the single sifter disc. A sifter meters a small quantity, which suits a strong adaptogen and nothing in the gummies group.

Which makes the 72 a coherent set

Bulk containers and metering closures. Those are the two things a powder needs that a gummy does not.

And the 3 round tub lids matter more than they look

Because the one tub on this shelf closes with a lid across its full diameter rather than a thread, and without those three it could not be closed at all.

References

The Davis Pack Supply catalog, measured 19 October 2026. 461 rows: 171 containers and 290 closures, of which 389 rows are shared with the gummies and chews group and 72 are specific to this one. 100 to 3,000 mL with a median of 355: 25 at 237 mL, 24 at 473, 21 at 118, 14 at 946, 12 at 355, 11 at 177, 10 at 562, 9 at 739. 135 PET and 36 HDPE, with no glass. 133 jars, 37 bottles, 1 tub. Necks: 70 at 89-400 and 38 at 70-400, so 108 of 171 have a mouth of 70 mm or wider, then 12 at 53-400, 10 at 58-400, 5 each at 38MM and 110-400, 4 each at 100-400, 63-485 and 43MM. Diameter is published on 152 containers at 1.8 to 5.7 inches with a median of 3.56, and height on 161 at 1.48 to 9.99 inches with a median of 3.56. Closures: 195 continuous thread polypropylene lids, 38 metal or aluminum CT caps, 22 dome lids, 13 spice caps, 8 sealing discs, 3 round tub lids, 2 phenolic, 2 dairy lids, 2 flip top caps, 1 spice sifter disc, 1 tamper evident lid. Buyability, a snapshot: 100 of 171 available, 71 not; 71 quote only; 20 full case only, with case packs from 12 to 3,150 and a median of 245.

The Davis Pack Supply catalog, measured 19 October 2026. Our capacity field is a volume in millilitres, published on 169 of the 171 containers in this group and running 100 to 3,000 mL with a median of 355. A powder supplement is declared by weight. We publish no bulk density and no fill weight, so a volume cannot be converted to a mass from our data. Bulk density is a property of the powder, and the five leaves in this group differ widely in it.

Written from 15 U.S.C. 1454(c) and from the catalog as it stood on 19 October 2026. That subsection authorizes regulations and is not itself a packaging requirement; nothing here describes the content of any regulation promulgated under it. Our capacity field is a volume and a powder is declared by weight, and we publish no bulk density, so the two cannot be reconciled from our data. Whether any ingredient in this group may be used is the new dietary ingredient question covered in the adjacent botanicals property and is not addressed here.