Mass against volume
On this page11
What we publish
A capacity in millilitres on 169 of the 171 containers, running 100 to 3,000 with a median of 355.
The commonest sizes
25 at 237 mL, 24 at 473, 21 at 118, 14 at 946, 12 at 355, 11 at 177, 10 at 562, 9 at 739. Eight sizes carry 126 of the 171.
Which are ounce sizes in metric clothing
237, 473 and 946 are 8, 16 and 32 fluid ounces. The shelf was built to customary volumes and is published in millilitres.
And a powder is declared in grams
So the number on the label and the number on our product page are different quantities measured in different units.
The bridge is bulk density
Which is a property of the powder, not of the jar, and we publish none. Any figure we offered would be wrong for most of the five leaves.
The five differ widely
A light botanical adaptogen, a dense dairy colostrum and a granular recovery blend do not pack the same way into a 473 mL jar.
So the measurement is one jar and one scale
Fill the size you are considering, weigh the contents, and the conversion is settled for that product and that size.
Then do it again after shipping
Because the settled volume is what a consumer sees, and the slack fill question is about the gap they see rather than the gap at the filler.
Dimensions are published and are the other half
Diameter on 152 containers at 1.8 to 5.7 inches, height on 161 at 1.48 to 9.99, and both medians are 3.56. So a typical container here is as wide as it is tall.
Which is a useful proportion for a scooped product
A tall narrow jar makes the last of a powder hard to reach. 108 of 171 have a mouth 70 mm or wider and the median proportion is square.