What this property does not cover
On this page13
Not what the panel must contain
Which nutrients and ingredients are declared, in what order, with what units and what daily values. That is the bulk of the section and none of it is here.
Not the format of the panel
Column rules, bar weights, indentation and the standard and simplified formats. Only the hairline allowance is quoted.
Not claims
Structure and function claims, the disclaimer that accompanies them, and health claims are separate schemes with their own rules.
Not whether an ingredient may be used
The new dietary ingredient question and the October 1994 line live in the adjacent botanicals property, and the determination is per ingredient.
Not manufacturing
Current good manufacturing practice for dietary supplements is its own part and bears on the container only indirectly.
And not state law
Which adds requirements in some states and which a national catalog cannot speak to.
What is here is the area arithmetic
Two thresholds, a computable lower bound from our published dimensions, and an honest statement of where the uncertainty sits.
Plus the servings per container consequence
Which makes the container size a declared number rather than an internal one, and ties the choice of jar to a figure on the label.
And the liner question, which the regulation says nothing about
A gummy fuses in a jar that takes up moisture, and no labeling rule addresses it. 81 of the 255 closures here carry a heat induction seal and 49 have no liner or no record of one.
Which is the recurring shape of these properties
The regulation decides the label and the catalog decides whether the product survives. Two separate questions and only one of them has a citation.
That is enough to choose a container with
Area band, fill, servings per container, and the closure and liner questions on the containers pages.
The rest belongs with a labeling professional
A panel is a document and this is a container catalog. The division is deliberate.