Building the system
On this page11
The temptation a big catalog creates
646 containers invites choosing the ideal one for each part. That produces a drawer of mismatched jars that do not stack, do not share caps and cannot be scanned at a glance.
One size, repeated
A tray of identical jars reads as a system. The eye finds the odd one out, the hand knows the grip, and a spare lid fits every single one.
Then one larger size for the few that need it
Bulk screws, a big bag of ballast, a part that will not fit. Two sizes covers almost every bench and still behaves as a system.
Straight sided, so the tray packs
Round jars in a rectangular drawer waste the corners. Straight sides and a flat base mean a drawer holds what it looks like it should.
Clear, so the label is a confirmation rather than the only clue
175 clear containers here. You should be able to tell what a jar holds before you read it, and read it to be sure.
Label on the body, in words
Not on the lid, because lids get swapped, and not in a code, because the code lives in your head and the jar outlives your memory of it.
And not by colour alone
Around one in twelve men cannot separate a colour code reliably. A letter or a number beside the colour costs nothing and makes the system legible to anyone.
Buy spare lids at the start
They are the part that gets lost, cracked or left on another jar. A box of spares that fits every container in the system is only possible because the system is one size.
Leave room to grow
A parts collection only ever gets bigger. Buying the tray half full is what stops the next ten parts arriving in whatever was to hand.
And keep the magnets out of it
Separate container, separate shelf, away from the ferrous parts, counted. The one leaf in this group that does not belong in the general system.