Decanting

Selling a decant

On this page11

A water-based acrylic decant travels A solvent-borne one is a different shipment And the classification is a measurement Carriers have their own limits Which is why the format question is a business question A convention table removes the carrier and not the label Breakage changes the glass calculation Batch records earn their keep here And the twelve-month clock runs on the label you keep reordering The honest summary References

The label is the first problem. Getting it to a buyer is the second.

A water-based acrylic decant travels

It is not a flammable liquid, it is not pressurized, and a lined cap in a padded box arrives intact. This is the straightforward case and most of the craft is in it.

A solvent-borne one is a different shipment

A flammable liquid in a parcel network carries packaging, marking and training requirements of its own under the hazardous materials rules. Those are not satisfied by a sturdy box.

And the classification is a measurement

Extremely flammable at or below 20 degrees F, flammable above that and below 100 degrees F, by the method at 16 CFR 1500.43a. The number comes from the carrier liquid rather than from the paint's name.

Carriers have their own limits

Separate from the regulations and often stricter, with their own approvals and surface-only restrictions. Ask before designing the product around a shipping method.

Which is why the format question is a business question

A decanted lacquer may be a fine product and an uneconomic one to ship. Finding that out after the bottles arrive is the expensive order to do it in.

A convention table removes the carrier and not the label

Handing a bottle to somebody in person is still marketing a substance for making art. The labeling obligation does not depend on the channel.

Breakage changes the glass calculation

Glass is the right resin for a solvent and the wrong material for a parcel network. That tension is real and it usually resolves as glass for the bench and water-based products for the post.

Batch records earn their keep here

Which bottle, which drum, which label version, which date. A problem in one batch is a recall of one batch if you can tell them apart and of everything if you cannot.

And the twelve-month clock runs on the label you keep reordering

New hazard information has to reach material manufactured after twelve months from discovery. A standing print order is the mechanism by which that gets missed.

The honest summary

Water-based decants are a sellable product with a labeling obligation. Solvent-borne decants are a bench practice that becomes a regulated shipment the moment you sell one.

References

16 CFR 1500.3(c)(6). "Extremely flammable" is a substance with a flashpoint "at or below 20 degrees F (-6.7 degrees C)"; "flammable" is "above 20 degrees F (-6.7 degrees C) and below 100 degrees F (37.8 degrees C)"; "combustible" is "at or above 100 degrees F (37.8 degrees C) to and including 150 degrees F (65.6 degrees C)". Each is determined by the test method at 16 CFR 1500.43a. law.cornell.edu

15 U.S.C. 1277, the Labeling of Hazardous Art Materials Act. Subsection (a) makes the labeling requirements of ASTM D-4236 "deemed to be a regulation issued by the Commission under section 1262(b) of this title". (b)(1) defines an art material as "Any substance marketed or represented by the producer or repackager as suitable for use in any phase of the creation of any work of visual or graphic art of any medium", excluding economic poisons under FIFRA and drugs, devices or cosmetics under the FFDCA. (b)(2) "applies to art materials intended for users of any age". (b)(5) requires the label of an art material needing chronic hazard labeling to carry "the name and address of the producer or repackager of the art materials and an appropriate telephone number and a statement signifying that such art materials are inappropriate for use by children". (b)(6) requires new hazard information to be "incorporated into the labels of such art materials that are manufactured after 12 months from the date of discovery". law.cornell.edu

Written from 15 U.S.C. 1277, 16 CFR 1500.14(b)(8) and 16 CFR 1500.3(c)(6), and from the catalog as it stood on 18 October 2026. Where a requirement turns on a determination the Commission makes rather than on a fixed rule, this property says so. Nothing here is a toxicological review, which is the one thing in this area that cannot be done from a document.