The range was read as a permission
On this page13
A 240 F ceiling was read as microwave safe
It is a tolerance. A microwave heats unevenly and the food gets hotter than the air, so a local hot spot can exceed the rating.
And a 300 F ceiling as oven safe
Also a tolerance. Only a manufacturer makes an oven safe claim and we publish no such claim on any product.
A dishwasher was assumed from the same number
A dishwasher is hot, wet and chemical at once. A temperature range addresses one of those three.
The 120 F group was overlooked
109 of 176 containers, which is 62 percent of the shelf, and 120 F is below a hot dishwasher.
So the commonest container here was bought for reheating
Which is the single likeliest error on this shelf, because PET is the commonest material and clear is the commonest color.
The 0 F floor was read as comfortable
45 containers at 0 to 240 F, and 0 F is a domestic freezer temperature exactly. A freezer running cold is below the rating.
And the two 300 F containers were assumed to be representative
They are 2 of 176. The whole both-ends offering on this shelf.
The catalog was not checked
The field takes nine values catalog-wide, so there may be more -100 to 300 F containers that are not indexed to this group.
Which the vape and pet grooming properties found elsewhere
Parts in the catalog and not routed to the group that needed them. Worth asking.
Material and rating were read separately
They agree here: 109 PET at a 120 F ceiling and the polypropylene group at 240. A disagreement between them on a product page is a reason to ask.
And thermal shock was ignored
A rating is a steady-state range. Moving a container from a freezer straight into hot water is a rate problem rather than a temperature one.
Read the range to eliminate, then ask
Which is the same conclusion the compounding property reaches about our chemical resistance rating.