Not less than each nutrient
On this page14
The first criterion
When consumed, contain not less than the quantity of each nutrient, as set forth on its label.
Which is not a spoilage test
It is a potency test. The question is whether the nutrients declared are still there in the declared amount.
Each nutrient, not the product
So the criterion is met only if every declared nutrient holds up. One that degrades faster than the others sets the date.
When consumed is the timing
Not when opened and not on the date. At the point of consumption, after preparation.
As set forth on its label is the reference
The declared quantity, which the maker chose. So the criterion compares the product against its own label.
Which means a conservative declaration buys a longer date
And is a real tension inside the scheme, since the declaration and the date are set by the same party.
Not less than is a floor
More is fine. The criterion is one-directional, which is why overage is the ordinary formulation practice.
And the container is implicated through loss
A nutrient that oxidizes, or that is lost to light, is a nutrient the container failed to protect.
Which connects to the compounding property's third word
Absorptive. A container that takes something out of a product leaves it under strength, and that is the same failure in a different scheme.
Light is the one our shelf speaks to
52 of the 176 containers are clear and 44 are white, with 20 amber, 16 black and 24 natural. So the protective options exist.
And the clear majority is a pantry convenience
Seeing what is in a container is the reason clear is the commonest single color on this shelf, and it is the opposite of protective.
And oxygen is the other loss path
109 of the 176 containers are PET, which is a reasonable oxygen barrier, and 45 are polypropylene, which is a poorer one. The material decides that half.
Two criteria, two different container consequences
Nutrient loss through light and oxygen, and clumping through moisture. The liner and the wall answer one each.