An ordinary bottle nipple
On this page14
The second criterion
Otherwise be of an acceptable quality, with the example given in brackets as pass through an ordinary bottle nipple.
Which is the most concrete quality test in this library
Not a specification, not a tolerance. Whether the product will go through the thing it has to go through.
And it is a packaging criterion
A bottle nipple is a delivery device. The quality standard is illustrated by whether the product can be delivered.
Which is unusual drafting
Acceptable quality is open-ended, and the bracketed example anchors it to something anybody can test in a kitchen.
Ordinary is doing work in it
Not a specified nipple and not a laboratory orifice. An ordinary one, which means the test is about real use.
The failure it describes is clumping
A powder that has taken up moisture forms lumps that will not pass a nipple. Which is a storage failure with a visible consequence.
And that is a container question
A formula container that admits moisture produces exactly the failure the criterion names.
Which is the clearest link between a container and a date anywhere
The date is selected on the basis that the product will still pass a nipple. The container is what decides whether it does.
Our liner data is the relevant field
Though this shelf is thin on it: 5 sealing discs out of 245 closures, and 174 plain continuous thread lids.
A plain lid is a reseal, not a barrier
Which for a powder opened daily is the ordinary arrangement, and it is not a moisture barrier in the way a heat induction seal is.
And a transferred formula loses the original seal entirely
Along with the date and the directions. Three things in one act.
And the example is bracketed rather than operative
Introduced with e.g., so passing a nipple illustrates acceptable quality rather than defining it. Other failures of acceptable quality are possible and are not named.
The first criterion is the other half
Nutrient content at consumption, which has its own page and is a different kind of claim.