Claims about the package itself
On this page13
Most label rules are about the contents
A net quantity, an ingredient list, a warning, a serving size. The package is the surface and the product is the subject.
These two are about the package
Whether it is refillable, and whether it is recyclable. Both are properties of the container and both are claims made on it.
Which makes them unusual among the spines here
The compounding property is about what a container must not do to a drug. These are about what a container may say about its own future.
And both turn on availability rather than on the object
Refillable turns on whether the means to refill is provided. Recyclable turns on whether programs and collection sites are available to consumers.
So neither can be answered from a specification
A resin code and a capacity do not tell you whether a program exists anywhere, and that is what the claims are about.
Which is why our Recyclable field is a problem
It is a specification field carrying a claim that depends on facts outside the product. 803 rows, all Yes.
The Green Guides are guidance on claims
They set out how the Commission views environmental marketing claims. Nothing on these pages describes the rest of them.
And they reach a marketer, not a container
Which is the division. We supply the container and whoever puts a claim on it is the marketer the guidance addresses.
Except where we make the claim ourselves
Which is exactly what a Recyclable field on a product page is. That part is ours.
So this property has two audiences
A buyer deciding what to print, and us. The second half is the one with the number in it.
The sixty percent figure is the one to remember
The guidance states that substantial majority, as used in that context, means at least 60 percent. A rare hard number in a document about claims.
And nothing in our data speaks to it
We record no program availability, no collection site data and no geography. Only Yes.