Buy a full case and the price per unit drops automaticallyRequest a sample
AccountCart0
All ContainersBottlesJarsCaps & ClosuresPumps & SprayersTubs & PailsJugsDroppersTinsTubesAccessories
Industries
Learn
Animal food law

The facility rule

On this page10
The exemption is real and it is partial.

What 507 is

Current good manufacturing practice, hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls for food for animals. The animal-food counterpart to the human food preventive controls rule.

The qualified facility exemption

"Except as provided in subpart D of this part, subparts C and E of this part do not apply to a qualified facility." That removes the hazard analysis and preventive controls subparts, not the whole rule.

And what remains

Qualified facilities "are subject to the requirements in 507.7". So the answer to "am I exempt" is never simply yes; it is exempt from these subparts and subject to that section.

The thresholds are not quoted here

What makes a facility qualified is a monetary definition that sits elsewhere in the regulations, and this property did not read it. Check it against your own numbers rather than assuming the exemption applies.

CGMP is the part people underestimate

Cleanliness, pest control, equipment design, water, training and records. For a small operation making feed supplements in a shed, this is usually the gap rather than the labeling.

It interacts with the ruminant ban directly

Separation of mammalian and non-mammalian protein, clean-out between runs, and written procedures are exactly the kind of thing CGMP is about. The two rules point at the same practices from different directions.

Records are the evidence

A practice you follow and cannot evidence is, to an inspector, a practice you may not follow. Both rules ask for written procedures, and the ruminant ban asks for a year of receipt, processing and distribution records specifically.

The exemption is about scale, not about care

A careful small operation and a careless one of the same size are both qualified facilities. The rule is sized to the business rather than to the practice, which means being exempt says nothing about whether the product is well made.

Write the procedures before you need them

Cleaning, pest control, training, water, equipment. Each is a page, and having them written is the difference between an inspection that goes well and one that goes on for a long time.

References

21 CFR 507, current good manufacturing practice, hazard analysis and risk-based preventive controls for food for animals. Under 507.5, "except as provided in subpart D of this part, subparts C and E of this part do not apply to a qualified facility", and qualified facilities "are subject to the requirements in 507.7". The thresholds defining a qualified facility sit in a separate definition and are not quoted here. law.cornell.edu
21 CFR 589.2000, the ruminant feed ban. Protein derived from mammalian tissues is prohibited in ruminant feed, with exceptions including blood products, gelatin, tallow, milk products and porcine or equine protein. Material containing prohibited protein is labeled "Do not feed to cattle or other ruminants". A facility handling both mammalian and non-mammalian protein maintains separate equipment or uses "clean-out procedures or other means adequate to prevent carry-over", with written procedures from receipt through shipment and records kept for at least one year. law.cornell.edu
Written from 21 CFR 501.4, 507.5 and 589.2000, and from the catalog as it stood on 18 October 2026. Commercial feed is also registered and labeled under state law, which this property points at rather than covers; whether a given product is a feed, a supplement or a drug is a determination with consequences, and a medicated feed is a different regime again.