The three suitable plastics
On this page9
The statement
"Suitable plastic enclosures are made of uncoated polyester, polyethylene, and polypropylene." Three materials, named, in preservation guidance from the Library of Congress.
Which maps onto the catalog exactly
PET is polyethylene terephthalate, which is a polyester. PP is polypropylene. HDPE and LDPE are polyethylene. Those are the materials this catalog is mostly made of.
So the shelf is almost entirely suitable material
81 PET and 64 PP out of 146 containers, plus one glass. By material, this is a conservation-appropriate shelf without anybody having curated it for that, because the catalog simply does not deal in the problem plastics.
Uncoated is doing work in that sentence
A coating, a print layer or an adhesive can be a different material from the container, and it is the part in contact with nothing you can see. For an enclosure the guidance wants the plastic itself, unadulterated.
Which is an argument against decoration
A printed or sleeved jar introduces materials the guidance has nothing to say about. For an archival use a plain container and a label on the outside is the conservative choice.
Glass is inert and heavy
One glass container on this shelf. Glass is chemically indifferent to everything a collection contains, which makes it ideal and breakable. For a display piece it is excellent; for a box of jars in a loft it is not.
The standard behind the advice
ISO 18902 and the Photographic Activity Test are what "photo-safe" means. They are tests on enclosure materials rather than on jars, and they are the vocabulary to use when asking a supplier whether something has been assessed.
Ask the question anyway
A container being PET does not mean it has been PAT tested. The material being a suitable one and the specific product having been assessed are two different claims, and only one of them is on a spec sheet.