Clear, and what it costs
On this page10
The archetype's position
"Displayed as much as stored. Clarity matters more than anything else." That is a fair description of how collectors treat a cabinet, and it describes a quarter of this shelf.
What clear gives you
Identification without opening, which for a sealed jar is the whole point: every opening replaces the dry atmosphere with the room. It also lets a humidity indicator card be read through the wall.
That second one is underrated
A sealed jar with an indicator you can read without breaking the seal is a self-reporting system. In an opaque jar the indicator is only useful at the moment you open it, which is the moment it stops being accurate.
What opaque gives you
Light exclusion. Some metal surfaces change under light and many inks fade, and a black or amber container removes that variable entirely for material that is being stored rather than shown.
So the answer splits by use
Display or active working material goes in clear. Long-term storage of anything light-sensitive goes in opaque, with the identification on the label rather than through the wall.
And a label solves most of it
A good label on an opaque jar does everything a clear wall does except show the indicator. Writing what is inside, when it was sealed and when the desiccant was changed is better practice than looking anyway.
The 35 are a real set
Mostly PET single wall jars across the size range. If clear is the requirement, that is the list, and it is deep enough to build a consistent system from.
Amber is a middle position
15 containers. It blocks the short wavelengths that do most of the photochemical work while still letting you see that something is in there, which for a working collection is often the right compromise.
Decide per jar, not per collection
There is no reason a collection has to be in one kind of container. The pieces you look at monthly and the pieces you have not opened since 2019 want different things.