Buy a full case and the price per unit drops automaticallyRequest a sample
AccountCart0
All ContainersBottlesJarsCaps & ClosuresPumps & SprayersTubs & PailsJugsDroppersTinsTubesAccessories
Industries
Learn
The finds

Arrowheads, shards and dug bottles

On this page11
One of these three has an exception. The other two do not.

Arrowheads

The one named in the exception, and only for removal from the surface of the ground, and only as against one subsection. Every other restriction still applies.

Pottery shards

An archaeological resource with no carve-out. On public or Indian lands the general prohibition applies to removing them, surface or not.

Dug bottles

Bottle digging is excavation, which is the activity subsection (a) names first. On public land that is the clearest problem in this group; on private land with permission it is a different conversation.

Age is not the test

People reason that a twentieth-century bottle cannot be archaeological. The definitions and the land status do the work, not an intuition about how old is old enough.

The commerce prohibition catches resale

Selling, exchanging or transporting in interstate commerce anything obtained in violation of state or local law is prohibited. A collection assembled casually can be unsellable.

Context is the thing being protected

An artifact removed from its context loses most of what makes it informative. That is the reason behind the statute rather than a bureaucratic preference, and it is worth knowing when deciding whether to pick something up.

Storage for these is about stability

Stone and ceramic are chemically robust and physically fragile. The container job is padding and separation rather than atmosphere, which is different from almost everything else in this property.

And the label is the collection

Where, when, on whose land, with what permission. For archaeological material that record is more valuable than the object and it is the first thing lost.

Human remains and funerary objects are a separate regime

If a find looks like it might be either, stop, leave it and report it. That is governed by its own law and it is not a collecting question at all.

Report a significant find

A site rather than a stray object is worth telling a state archaeologist about. It costs nothing, it is usually welcomed, and it is how surface finds turn into knowledge.

References

16 U.S.C. 470ee, the Archaeological Resources Protection Act. Subsection (a): "No person may excavate, remove, damage, or otherwise alter or deface... any archaeological resource located on public lands or Indian lands" without a permit. Subsection (c) prohibits sale, purchase, exchange, transport or receipt in interstate or foreign commerce of a resource obtained in violation of state or local law. Subsection (g): "Nothing in subsection (d) of this section shall be deemed applicable to any person with respect to the removal of arrowheads located on the surface of the ground." law.cornell.edu
Written from 16 U.S.C. 703 and 470ee, and from the catalog as it stood on 18 October 2026. Whether a particular find may lawfully be collected or kept depends on the species, the land it was found on and the state; this property names the questions rather than answering them for a specific object, and a valuable or unusual find deserves a better source than a packaging catalog.