The shelf is wrong, not empty
On this page11
What is indexed to this group
74 containers, every one of them glass, 60 of which are glass boston rounds. No polypropylene, no PET, no polyethylene, nothing.
And an e-liquid bottle is squeezed
That is how it dispenses: a soft polyethylene body, a narrow tip, and a press. A glass bottle cannot do it at all.
So the shelf is not thin, it is wrong
Which is a different diagnosis from the other properties here. Hazmat has a data gap. Concentrates has a shelf gap. This is a routing failure.
The right containers exist in our catalog
24 LDPE containers sit inside the exact 10 to 120 mL window this group's archetype specifies, along with 44 HDPE in the same window. 68 polyethylene containers, none indexed here.
Including two with a dripper tip neck
Two of the LDPE containers carry a 20-410DT finish, which is the neck family built for exactly this. They are in the catalog and not on this shelf.
The cause is a scoring preference
The archetype for this spoke lists Glass as a preferred material and forbids nothing. Glass scored higher, filled the shelf, and the preference became an exclusion.
Which is a quiet failure mode
Nothing was excluded on purpose. A ranked list with a cap produces the same result as a ban when the preferred material is plentiful.
And it is fixable in the index
Not in the catalog and not in the writing. A material preference that reserves room for the alternative, or a separate archetype for a squeeze bottle.
Meanwhile the glass is right for the other group on this shelf
Tinctures share these 74 containers and 215 closures, and for an alcohol extract glass is the correct answer. One shelf, two groups, one of which it suits.
Stated so a buyer does not conclude we have nothing
We have 68 polyethylene containers in the right size. The index is not showing them here, and that is worth saying out loud.