The shelf, measured in inches
On this page11
We publish height and diameter
Height on 95 of 97 containers, diameter on 92. Which makes a physical fit checkable without ordering a sample, and for this group the physical fit is the question.
And the numbers describe a squat shelf
Height runs 1.25 to 6.59 inches with a median of 2.64. Diameter runs 1.25 to 4.63 with a median of 2.81. The typical container here is wider than it is tall.
Only 10 of 97 are taller than one and a half diameters
So there is essentially no tall-narrow format in this group. Everything is a jar proportion, which is a consequence of the archetype calling for a wide mouth.
Which decides the pre-roll question
A 100 mm pre-roll is a little under 4 inches. Six containers here are 4 inches or taller, and five are 4.5 or taller.
Six out of ninety-seven
So standing a pre-roll upright is possible and it is not what this shelf is for. Laid flat in a wide jar is the format actually available.
The tallest is 6.59 inches
Which would take a pre-roll with room above it. One container, and worth knowing exists.
Headspace is a ratio, not a volume
A short wide jar at half fill has a large surface of product exposed to a thin layer of air. A tall narrow one at half fill exposes a small surface to a tall column. For a volatile fraction the surface is what matters.
So the squat proportion works against this product
Which is a second reason, beyond raw volume, that the concentrates in this group are badly served here. The shape is as wrong as the size.
33 of 97 are full case only
And case packs on this shelf run from 72 to 1,000. For a first production run that is a real commitment, and it is published on the product page rather than discovered at checkout.
The inventory itself is written up elsewhere
Sizes, materials and colors are the same 97 rows the edibles property enumerates, because this shelf is shared with that group and with adjacent botanicals. No point stating it twice.