The products

The powders

On this page11

What a botanical powder needs from a container The mouth is well served The wall is partly served Moisture is the quality variable Which is the concentrates property's subject Volume is where the shelf is thin for bulk The tubs are the closest thing And the price is low enough for a consumable format Case packs are the catch None of which is the hard question References

A bulk powder wants a wide mouth and an opaque wall. Both of which this shelf has.

What a botanical powder needs from a container

A mouth wide enough for a scoop, a wall that keeps light out, a seal that keeps moisture out, and enough volume that the customer is not refilling constantly.

The mouth is well served

Necks on this shelf run mostly 89-400 and 70-400, which are wide. A scoop that has to be tipped and shaken loses powder down the outside of the jar.

The wall is partly served

29 white and 11 black containers out of 97 are opaque. 19 clear and 24 natural are not, and natural polypropylene passes a surprising amount of light.

Moisture is the quality variable

A hygroscopic powder cakes, and once it cakes the scoop stops working and the customer concludes the product is old. The liner is what prevents it.

Which is the concentrates property's subject

It covers the liner shelf in full: heat induction seal, F217, pressure sensitive and the 54 closures out of 260 with no liner or no record of one.

Volume is where the shelf is thin for bulk

13 containers at 473 mL is the top of this shelf, and a kilo of a light botanical powder is several litres. For a bulk format this is not it.

The tubs are the closest thing

12 tubs and pails out of 97, which open fully and take a scoop properly. For a powder that is a better format than a jar.

And the price is low enough for a consumable format

Unit prices on this shelf run 30 cents to $3.69 with a median of 90 cents, measured as a snapshot. That is a packaging cost a repeat-purchase powder can carry.

Case packs are the catch

33 of 97 containers are full case only and case packs run from 12 to 6,370. A first run has to absorb a whole case.

None of which is the hard question

The hard question is the ingredient, and it is answered from records against a date in 1994 rather than from a catalog.

References

The Davis Pack Supply catalog, measured 19 October 2026. This group returns 357 rows: 97 containers and 260 closures, the same rows the edibles and concentrates and flower groups return, because the packaging archetype is assigned at the spoke level and all three spokes resolve to the same one. The full inventory is enumerated in the edibles property. In outline: 30 to 473 mL with a median of 177, nothing below 30; 66 PP and 31 glass; 78 jars, 12 tubs and pails, 6 bottles, 1 tube; necks mostly 89-400 and 70-400.

The Davis Pack Supply catalog, measured 19 October 2026, a single snapshot rather than a trend. Of the 97 containers in this group: 66 are flagged available, 30 are not and 1 has nothing recorded; 32 of the 96 with a recorded quantity are at zero; 31 are quote only; 33 are full case only, with case packs ranging from 12 to 6,370; 14 are drop ship only. Unit prices run from 30 cents to $3.69 with a median of 90 cents. The shipping weight field on this shelf reaches 2,002 lb, which is a case or pallet weight sitting in a unit field, so it should not be relied on.

Written from 21 U.S.C. 321(ff) and 21 U.S.C. 350b and from the catalog as it stood on 19 October 2026. Nothing here says whether any particular botanical is a lawful dietary ingredient, a new dietary ingredient or saleable: those are per-ingredient determinations, federal agencies have taken positions on several of these which this property does not summarize, and state law differs. Availability and stock figures are a single snapshot rather than a trend. The shipping weight field on this shelf reaches 2,002 lb, which is a case weight in a unit field, so do not rely on it.