New dietary ingredient
On this page13
The definition again, because it is short
A dietary ingredient that was not marketed in the United States before October 15, 1994. That is the whole test.
So new is a market fact
Not a botanical fact, not a novelty, and not a judgment about risk. A thousand-year-old plant can be a new dietary ingredient.
And an old American ingredient is not new however exotic
Which cuts both ways and is why the records matter more than the description.
The consequence is a deeming, not a ban
A supplement containing a new dietary ingredient is deemed adulterated unless it meets one of two requirements. There are two ways through.
Form is inside the question
Marketed before the date in what form, as what, and by whom. A traditional preparation and a modern concentrated extract are not obviously the same ingredient.
Which is where the chemical alteration language bites
The first route requires a form in which the food has not been chemically altered. Extraction and concentration are exactly the processes that question is about.
For this group that is the live issue
Mushroom extract and blue lotus extract are extracts by name. Whether an extract is the pre-1994 ingredient is the determination, and it is not ours.
The burden sits with whoever introduces the product
Which is the maker, not the container supplier. We sell jars and we have no visibility into an ingredient history.
And the notification route has a clock
75 days before introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce. A deadline that runs against a production calendar.
And the two halves of the test are independent
An ingredient can be old in the American market and the product can still fail the definition on its labeling, or the labeling can be perfect and the ingredient still sit behind the gate. Two tests, neither answering the other.
Which is why the order matters
Settle the ingredient question first, because it decides whether there is a product at all. The label questions are solvable at any point before printing.
Both routes are quoted on the next page
With the exact wording, because a paraphrase of either one would be doing the reader a disservice in a category this consequential.