How to write it
Updated
On this page8
Both systems, always
Statements of weight shall be in terms of both avoirdupois pound and ounce and SI metric kilograms, grams or milligrams. The worked examples in the rule look like "Net Wt 15 oz (425 g)" and "Net Mass 425 g (15 oz)". One system alone is not a compliant declaration.
Under a pound, use ounces
Which is every melt pack worth selling. "Net Weight 12 oz (340 g)" is the shape. Above a pound the rule switches to whole pounds with a remainder, and a melt pack rarely gets there.
Only these abbreviations
500.22 lists them and says none other may be employed in the required declaration: oz, lb, wt, fl, liq, pt, qt, gal, in, ft, yd, sq, cu, avdp. Periods and plural forms are optional. Anything else you invent is outside the list.
Only these metric symbols
500.23 does the same for metric: g, kg, mg, mL or ml, L or l, cm, mm and the rest. Symbols except liter are not capitalized, periods should not follow them, and they are always singular. So "Grams" and "gms." are both wrong.
Numerical range for the metric figure
The prefix should be chosen so the number falls between 1 and 1000, so 1.96 kg rather than 1960 g. Below 100 grams the figure may be shown in two digits rather than three, which is the case most melt packs are in.
Write it once and reuse it
A single compliant string, set in the right size, reused across the range with only the number changing. That is how this stops being a per-label decision and starts being a template.
Why the closed lists exist
A shopper comparing two jars has to read both declarations without learning anybody's house style. Fixing the abbreviations and the symbols is what makes that possible, which is also why an invented abbreviation is not a small deviation.