The fluid evaporated
Updated
On this page9
What it looks like
A fluid level that has dropped, a specimen partly exposed and gone brittle or discolored, and sometimes crystalline residue at the neck. By the time it is visible the damage is usually done.
The liner is almost always the cause
Alcohol passes through, swells or dissolves several common liner materials. Of the 222 closures on this shelf, 61 carry an HIS induction-seal liner and 38 an F217, and which suits your preservative is a question for the supplier.
Induction seals change the problem
A bonded membrane is a much better barrier than a compressed gasket, and it needs a sealing machine. For a long-term collection that is a real argument for sealing rather than just capping.
Warm storage accelerates everything
An attic or a sunny room drives evaporation and expands the headspace. Cool, dark and stable is not a preference here, it is the difference between a decade and a few years.
Top up, and record it
A collection in fluid needs checking and topping up on a schedule, and the schedule is the actual conservation practice. A jar nobody has opened in ten years is not preserved, it is unmonitored.
Glass removes one variable
All 29 containers here are glass, so the wall is not permeating. That narrows the investigation to the closure, the liner and the storage, which is as it should be.
Keep one jar as a control
Filled with fluid and no specimen, sealed the same way, stored the same way, and weighed occasionally. It tells you the loss rate of your own closure choice without risking anything.
It is the commonest loss in a fluid collection
Not contamination and not breakage. Slow evaporation through an unsuitable liner, discovered years later, with the specimen already damaged. Spending on the closure is spending on the specimen, which is not how most people allocate a budget for a jar.